Lecturer's Précis - Freud (1933)

Copyright Notice: This material was written and published in Wales by Derek J. Smith (Chartered Engineer). It forms part of a multifile e-learning resource, and subject only to acknowledging Derek J. Smith's rights under international copyright law to be identified as author may be freely downloaded and printed off in single complete copies solely for the purposes of private study and/or review. Commercial exploitation rights are reserved. The remote hyperlinks have been selected for the academic appropriacy of their contents; they were free of offensive and litigious content when selected, and will be periodically checked to have remained so. Copyright © 2010, High Tower Consultants Limited.

 

First published online 10:23 BST 30th April 2002, Copyright Derek J. Smith (Chartered Engineer). This version [HT.1 - transfer of copyright] dated 12:00 13th January 2010

An earlier version of this material appeared in Smith (1999). It is reproduced here with minor amendments and supported with hyperlinks.

 

Sigmund Freud as Cognitive Modeller (Example Five of Five)

Read firstly Freud (1891), Freud (1896), Freud (1900), and Freud (1923).

Here is how the 1923 diagram had evolved in Freud's thinking by the time he wrote "New Introductory Lectures" in 1933.

Freud's (1933) Classic Hierarchical Diagram - Mark II: Here, from New Introductory Lectures, we see a later variant of the 1923 diagram. The unconscious is now shown explicitly at the point where the ego shades into the id, and the preconscious remains at the point where the ego shades into the perceptual consciousness. The superego has been included for good measure, but has been offset to a position where it can monitor what the ego is up to. Once again, however, the information flowlines have been left (infuriatingly) implicit. Upon inspection, the role of the id turns out to be rather troublesome, because if we take at face value Freud's assertion that "the id has intercourse with the external world only through the ego" (p111) we would have to show the information flow descending from the apex and returning upwards to it rather than the other way around!

PICfreud1933.gif

Redrawn from Freud (1933/1964:111). This version Copyright © 2002, Derek J. Smith.

 

There are many points of similarity between the more mature Freudian diagrams (the 1923/1933 versions) and the control hierarchy diagrams shown in, say, Wundt (1902) or Craik (1945). For example, both adopt a three-level control hierarchy wherein each level owes it to its neighbours to keep private as much of its processing as it can. But they differ, of course, in considering the motivation for this secrecy - a Freudian would see it as a matter of the psychosexual acceptability of the material concerned, whilst a control engineer would see it merely as a matter of efficiency or inefficiency. Either way, what emerges is a layer cake of qualitatively different memory types with quantitatively different rights of access to consciousness.

  

References

Freud, S. (1933/1964). New Introductory Lectures. Harmondsworth: Penguin. [Being the Penguin edition of the 1964 Strachey translation of the German original.]

Smith D.J. (1999). Freudian Structures in the Computational Mind: Some Lessons from the Study of Ritual Sacrifice. Cardiff: UWIC. [ISBN: 1900666111] [Transcript of paper presented 15th April 1999 to the 13th Annual Conference of the History and Philosophy of Psychology Section of the BPS, York.]